Caddy
Service clients
Information de commande
Encyclopédie
Expériences
Des lois plus sévères en Australie
Le gouvernement de l’Australie-Occidentale plan de durcir sa législation de cannabis en réduisant la limite de possession légale de 30g à 10g et par l'interdiction de la vente de tous les instruments et accessoires de fumer.
Présenté cette semaine, la nouvelle législation permettra d'annuler l’ancienne loi, le Cannabis Control Act, qui permettait aux gens de cultiver deux plantes pour un usage personnel.
En vertu de la nouvelle loi des personnes surpris avec de petites quantités de la drogue devront se soumettre à des traitements et ne pas récidiver pendant trois ans pour effacer leur casier judiciaire.
Toutes personnes attrapées en vendant des accessoires illégaux à des mineurs devront faire face à une amende de 10.000 $.
Tout en admettant qu'il n'avait jamais essayé cette drogue, le premier ministre Colin Barnett a déclaré que les autorités de santé sont déterminées que: «le cannabis d'aujourd'hui est beaucoup plus puissant et beaucoup plus meurtrières que le cannabis dans les années 1960 et 1970».
"Ce que je souhaite est une réduction de l'usage de cannabis et que nous serons beaucoup plus efficaces en aidant les gens à rester loin des drogues et de réhabilitation s'ils ont un problème de drogue", a déclaré M. Barnett. "Près de 80 pour cent des admissions (dans les hôpitaux psychiatriques) sont en quelque sorte liée aux drogues».
Sous la deuxième loi la police de l’Australie-Occidentale sera dotée de pouvoirs sans précédent à la recherche de personnes pour les drogues et les armes.
La nouvelle loi de recherche, qui sera présenté avant Noël, signifiera que la police n’aura plus besoin de prouver des motifs de suspicion au court de justice.
Source: The Australian
Cannabis meurtrière? C'est un mensonge flagrant.
Juste comme dire que 80% des admissions sont liées à la drogue (quelles drogues?) ne nous dit rien sur la véritable cause des maladies mentales et les troubles émotionnels.
Et combien de fois devons-nous répéter que les lois sur les drogues n'aident pas les gens à rester loin des drogues?
Scandaleux, n'est-ce pas?
|
|
|
Commentaires
zavala - 2009-10-19 19:49:28
"Under the second new law West Australian police will be given unprecedented powers to search people for drugs and weapons."
how is that possible.. they dont have to have probable cause??? i hope that nvr happens in the us. violating peoples rights to the maxxx
jeroen - 2009-10-19 23:24:07
+1
Its just crazy what they are doing there. And as said before 80% of the people who enter psychiatric hospitals are drug addicts? Well sure but just for the sake of being correct say which drugs. They are allways in every country taking on the battle against marihuana it seems like its a sport for politicians to catch as many stoners or recreational smokers. I wish they'd do some research on it instead of stigmatizing it all the time. Numbers don't lie but as long as those bastards earn taxes on tobacco and alcohol they will keep on selling them even when they know it kills and its bad for you're health. Marihuane may not be healthy eather (no substance is in my opinion) but in the least not as dangerous as alcohol.
I challenge the ministers to go drinking for a whole night and the next week to smoke a few joints in the evening see which one will make you feel worse in the morning you're body cant lie.
RSS Feeds
Truth - 2009-10-18 14:27:37
There is something that we in the West consider as one of the greater goods of our society, and that is: personal responsibility.
There have been and always will be people that can't handle (certain) freedom(s). But the way this "drug problem" is "treated", illustrates what government and hierarchy in general do to people. It reduces an adult individual to that of a helpless child that needs to be directed and sometimes punished for his "misconduct". Giving children a sense of responsibility is the best way towards responsible adulthood. Forcing children to go in a certain way makes them perhaps obedient, but eventually creates frustration and hatred towards the one governing them.
When will government implement the approach of giving more personal responsibility? In my opinion: never. Or, as long as people point their fingers towards government to solve problems, for which the people themselves don't feel empowered anymore, this method will remain. This approach undermines government's very right of existence. All the trivial rules and regulations would become obsolete when people's personal responsibility would become something that would be emphasized throughout society.
On the other hand, government only emphasizes personal responsibility when it legitimizes control over the individual. They also emphasize it when there is money to be made.
What actually gives government the right to govern your personal life with all it's aspects?
Apart from all this there is also always the aspect that mind-expanding substances change people's views. In other words it makes people less suggestible to, say, the dominant view that is mostly propogated by the media. Right now the chosen drugs by the (forced upon) global dominant culture are:
1. Media
2. Alcohol
3. Caffeïne
4. Nicotine
A proven cocktail that has been very succesful at keeping the status quo.
Always and always ask yourself: Qui Bono? (Who profits?)